Assignment 4, CSC430, Winter 2014

1 Goal

Extend the interpreter to handle mutable arrays.

2 Guidelines

2.1 Contracts & Test Cases

For this and all remaining assignments, every function you develop must come with the following things:

• A commented header line that expresses the result of the function in terms of its inputs, written in English. Be as precise as you can within the space of a line or two. The header lines must include input and output types.

• Test cases. A function without test cases is incomplete. Write the test cases first, please.

2.2 Handling errors

Your parser and interpreter must detect errors and explicitly signal them by calling (error ...). We will consider an error raised internally by Scheme to be a bug in your code.

For example, Scheme signals a "divide by zero" error if you attempt to evaluate (/ 1 0). Since we use Scheme’s division function to implement division in CFWAE, you may be tempted to leave it to Scheme to signal division by zero errors for you. However, you must signal the error yourself by explicitly testing for division by zero before calling Scheme’s division procedure.

2.3 Language Level & File Format

Your solution should take the form of a single file. Solve each problem separately, and make sure that each solution appears in a separate part of the file, with comments separating each problem’s solution.

Hand in your solution using the handin server. For help with the handin server, please see the course web page.

3 The Assignment

For this assignment, you must implement with, mutable arrays, and mutable bindings.

As in previous assignments, the with form should just expand into an application.

3.1 New Forms

• array: creates a fresh array of the given size, with all cells filled with the given value. So, for instance, {array 34 0.0} would create an array of 34 cells, all containing 0.0.

• ref : returns an element of an array. So, for instance, {ref p [15]} would return the contents of cell 15 of the array named by p. If the array does not have that many elements, you must signal an error.

• set : the first set form is for arrays. So, for instance, {set p [15] = {f 6}} would set element 15 of the array named by p to be the result of calling f with 6. It must return 19.

• set : the second set form is used to mutate bindings. So, for instance, {set l = 9} will change the binding of l to contain 9. It must return 20.

• begin : evaluates a sequence of expressions, returning the last one. So, for instance, {begin {f 9} p} would evaluate {f 9}, then return the value of p.

In order to allow mutable bindings and arrays, you’ll need to add a store, and rewrite your interpreter in store-passing style, as we did in class.

3.2 Old Forms

In a language with mutation, programmers can observe the order of evaluation of binop arguments, and function call arguments. For this language, all of these must perform left-to-right evaluation.

4 Suggested Implementation Strategy

Store-passing style is a bear. Here’s how I’d get started.

First thing, I’d strip down the language from assignment 3. Start in the parser, and comment out everything but binops and numbers. Comment out all of the test cases except those for binops. If you don’t have any tests that just use binops, write some, and make sure they work.

Next, I’d comment out the evaluation rules for everything but numbers and binops in the interpreter. Add an else clause that catches everything else and signals the error "unimplemented". At this point, your binop test cases should still work fine.

Time to add the store! Formulate the define-types and type aliases that you’ll need for stores (just like the book’s). Change the interp function so that it accepts a store, and returns a v*s. Update your test cases so that they pass a store in, and expect the v*s including the answer and the store. Rewrite the interp rules for numbers and binops so that they thread the store through the computation as they should.

With luck and some effort, you should be able to get those binop programs working again.

If this takes you a lot of time and effort, don’t worry: this is probably the hardest part of the assignment. Once you get the hang of transforming code into store-passing style, it will get easier. Check to make sure that each store is used exactly once (with the exception of the mutation operations you’ll add later).

Next, I would add the mutation operations. Note that I’m advising you to add these before adding your other language forms (ids, funs, applications, if’s, and booleans) back in. First off, I think I’d add an allocate helper function that accepts a store, a number of locations to be allocated, and a value to place in all of them, and returns two things; the base location, and a new store. It’s up to you how you represent the "last allocated" pointer, but I’m perfectly happy if you choose to represent this as a mutable counter, in the style of the book’s new-loc. Write the test case before you write this function! Really!

Next, I would add the array operation to the set of expressions, to the interpreter, and to the parser. At this point, you should be able to create arrays, and the result of interpretation should include a store that contains lots of new allocated locations. Note that the representation of arrays is up to you, but it had probably better include a location and a length.

At this point, I would go back and add test cases that create arrays as subexpressions of binops; check that the allocations happen in the right order. As you go forward, you’ll want to use this technique to check order of evaluation for all of your forms.

At this point, it starts to make less difference what order you add language forms in. I think I would probably wait on applications, just because there will be lots of opportunities for mistakes.

Good luck!

4.1 Syntax of ACFAE

The concrete syntax of the ACFAE language with these additional features can be captured with the following EBNF:

... where an id is not true, false, with, if, fun, array, set, =, begin or one of the operator names.

5 Support Code

In order to allow me to test your code, you’ll need a top-level parse-evaluate-serialize function. Here it is:

(define (top-eval [s : s-expression]) : string

(serialize (v*s-v (interp (parse s) empty-env empty-store))))

Your body can be different if necessary, but the types must match these.